On November 18, 2025, Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado published a "Freedom Manifesto" from a secret location inside Venezuela, framing the current moment as decisive and sketching her vision for a "new era" without President Nicolás Maduro. The video, distributed widely on social media, landed as U.S. warships—including the USS Gerald R. Ford carrier strike group—deployed within striking distance of Venezuela, the largest Caribbean military buildup in decades. "That decisive hour is imminent; the position that each one takes will mark their life forever," Machado declared, addressing Venezuelans across the political spectrum.
The manifesto is both a policy prospectus and a moral indictment. Machado commits to restoring core civil liberties—freedom of expression, fair elections, the right of assembly—and urges the return of exiles. She lays out sweeping economic reforms, including privatization of state companies, especially in oil and gas, with a goal of tripling GDP within a decade and repositioning Venezuela as a regional energy and democratic leader. Crucially, she appeals directly to the Venezuelan military and police to lay down arms and back a peaceful transition, promising profound reforms to professionalize the security forces and secure their rights. Yet the document arrives at a moment when external military pressure risks overshadowing domestic political momentum, offering Maduro a nationalist rallying point even as international human rights bodies document the repressive machinery Machado seeks to dismantle.
The manifesto's institutional blueprint
Machado's program targets the authoritarian infrastructure built over two decades of Chavismo. The restoration of civil liberties is not merely rhetorical; it addresses systematic repression documented by Human Rights Watch and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights following Venezuela's disputed July 28, 2024, election. International observers criticized the electoral process after authorities declared Maduro re-elected, while opposition tabulations indicated challenger Edmundo González had won. Post-election crackdowns included killings, enforced disappearances, and mass arbitrary arrests. As of July 21, 2025, 853 political prisoners remained in detention, according to Foro Penal data cited by Human Rights Watch.
The economic vision is equally sweeping. Privatization of PDVSA, the state oil monopoly, represents a direct assault on the patronage networks and criminal-political economies that sustain Maduro's coalition. Machado projects tripling GDP within a decade—an ambitious target that assumes functional institutions, international credit access, and social trust, all corroded by years of mismanagement and repression. The plan envisions Venezuela reclaiming its position as a regional energy anchor, a goal that requires not just capital but the political stability her manifesto promises but cannot guarantee.
Her outreach to the military and police is perhaps the most delicate element. Venezuelan security forces are not monolithic; they include career officers weary of international isolation, mid-level commanders enriched by smuggling economies, and rank-and-file troops whose families have fled the country. Machado's promise of professionalization and rights protections aims at this fracture, but such appeals succeed only when officers perceive a credible off-ramp. External military pressure can narrow that window, pushing security elites toward regime survival over defection.
Members are reading: How Venezuela's documented torture infrastructure shapes Machado's accountability demands and the challenges of transitional justice under external military pressure.
The shadow of militarization
Machado explicitly welcomes increased U.S. pressure on Maduro, and the timing is no accident. Since September, U.S. forces have conducted multiple lethal strikes on alleged drug-running vessels in Caribbean waters, killing dozens, according to compiled reporting; legal justifications remain contested. The deployment has evolved into Operation Southern Spear, framed explicitly around counter-narcotics and counter-terrorism, with public discussion of potential land targets inside Venezuela. The U.S. designation of the Cartel de los Soles—a network allegedly linking top Venezuelan officials to drug trafficking—as a Foreign Terrorist Organization further hardened the policy climate, blurring the line between state and criminal actors in ways that justify expanded military action.
Venezuela has responded with large-scale mobilizations and military exercises, a predictable move that shores up nationalist sentiment and justifies further internal repression. The external threat narrative allows Maduro to frame dissent as treason and opposition leaders as foreign agents, undermining precisely the kind of broad-based, peaceful mobilization Machado's manifesto envisions. The U.S. deployment may accelerate elite fractures within the regime, but it also risks crowding out the domestic political space her strategy requires.
Institutions or armadas
Machado's manifesto is a serious document: policy-specific, institutionally grounded, and morally clear about the abuses it seeks to redress. Its viability, however, depends on factors external military pressure tends to distort—internal alignments within the security forces, social trust across Venezuela's polarized society, and the credibility of opposition promises in the eyes of ordinary Venezuelans exhausted by years of crisis. The evidence of systematic repression is irrefutable, documented by multiple international bodies. The question is not whether Maduro presides over a criminal apparatus—he does—but whether the pathway to dismantling it runs through domestic political mobilization or external military intervention. Machado has chosen the former; Washington's deployments suggest a parallel logic. Whether those tracks converge or collide will define Venezuela's next chapter, and the lives of its people.
Subscribe to our free newsletter to unlock direct links to all sources used in this article.
We believe you deserve to verify everything we write. That's why we meticulously document every source.
