U.S. intends to designate Maduro-linked cartel as a terrorist organization, blurring lines between state and crime

On November 17, 2025, the U.S. State Department announced it will designate Cartel de los Soles—a Venezuela-based narcotrafficking network allegedly headed by Nicolás Maduro and senior regime officials—as a Foreign Terrorist Organization, effective November 24. The move places a sitting head of state at the apex of a U.S.-designated terrorist entity for the first time in the modern FTO framework, expanding Washington's counterterrorism authorities against state-adjacent criminal structures. According to the State Department, the cartel corrupted Venezuela's military, intelligence, legislature, and judiciary, and operates alongside other designated FTOs including Tren de Aragua and Mexico's Sinaloa Cartel to traffic drugs into the United States and Europe and commit terrorist violence across the hemisphere.

The designation marks a doctrinal escalation in how the United States treats transnational criminal organizations with alleged state ties. By applying the legal architecture of counterterrorism to a network identified with a national government, Washington gains expanded enforcement tools—criminal prosecution of material supporters, asset seizure, and entry bars—while simultaneously raising complex questions about state attribution and the boundaries between non-state terrorism and state responsibility. The announcement coincides with a surge in U.S. military presence in the Caribbean, including deployment of the USS Gerald R. Ford carrier group, framed as counter-narcoterrorism operations that parallel the legal designation with kinetic posture.

What the designation means in practice

FTO status carries three immediate legal consequences under U.S. law. First, it bars members of Cartel de los Soles from entering the United States. Second, it authorizes seizure of the organization's funds and assets within U.S. jurisdiction. Third, and most significantly, it criminalizes the provision of material support to the group—a broad prohibition that exposes anyone who transacts with, finances, or otherwise resources the cartel to federal prosecution. These standard FTO consequences, confirmed by Bloomberg Español, are reinforced by the cartel's earlier designation as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist by the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control on July 25, 2025.

According to OFAC's July press release, the cartel's name derives from sun insignias worn on Venezuelan military uniforms, underscoring the alleged integration of the network with state security institutions. Treasury described Cartel de los Soles as providing material support to both Tren de Aragua—a transnational organization implicated in drug trafficking, human smuggling, extortion, sexual exploitation, and money laundering—and the Sinaloa Cartel, a major supplier of fentanyl, methamphetamine, and cocaine to U.S. markets. Both Tren de Aragua and Sinaloa were designated as FTOs on February 20, 2025, positioning the Soles listing as part of a coordinated escalation. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent emphasized the administration's commitment to "exposing the illegitimate Maduro regime's facilitation of narco-terrorism" and executing the President's pledge to crack down on violent organizations and their facilitators.

OFAC sanctions also create secondary sanctions risk for foreign financial institutions that transact with designated entities, raising due diligence and compliance costs for U.S. partners and potentially chilling cooperation in regions where institutional capacity is weak. For governments and firms operating in Latin America, the expanded legal exposure complicates routine financial flows and forces painful trade-offs between commercial relationships and sanctions compliance.

Exclusive Analysis Continues:

Members are reading: How the FTO label deepens a legal paradox—blurring state and non-state terrorism—and why that raises escalation risks.

Become a Member for Full Access

Compliance pressure and regional dynamics

For regional governments and international partners, the designation creates immediate compliance pressures. Banks, multinational corporations, and governments must now assess whether counterparts in Venezuela or neighboring states have ties to Cartel de los Soles, or risk secondary sanctions and legal exposure. That calculus is especially fraught in countries with weak rule of law or where Venezuelan migration and remittance flows are substantial. The designation effectively extends U.S. jurisdiction into financial and commercial decisions across the hemisphere, with enforcement risk extending far beyond the cartel's core operations.

Caracas, predictably, has rejected the designation. Regional media including La Nación report Venezuelan officials' claims that Washington is pursuing regime change and cite Maduro's denial of narcotrafficking accusations. These denials reflect a longstanding pattern in which the Maduro government frames U.S. sanctions and legal actions as pretexts for destabilization. Whether the FTO designation accelerates that dynamic or merely codifies existing hostility depends largely on how Washington deploys its new authorities—and whether enforcement remains in the legal domain or spills into kinetic operations that validate Caracas's narrative.

The practical question is whether the designation enhances or undermines regional security. Optimistically, it provides a clear legal basis for prosecuting material supporters, isolating the cartel financially, and coordinating law-enforcement efforts with willing partners. Pessimistically, it entrenches a policy framework that conflates counterterrorism with regime pressure, increasing the risk of miscalculation and widening a confrontation that already features carrier groups, military strikes framed as counter-narcotics, and competing claims about sovereignty and intervention. For now, the designation is effective November 24. What follows will depend on whether Washington prioritizes compliance enforcement or coercive escalation.