European leaders gather in Berlin as Ukraine's red line meets Washington's timeline

Talks resume under domestic constraint that 75 percent of Ukrainians reject territorial trade-offs without enforceable security guarantees, testing whether European guardrails can reconcile U.S. speed with Kyiv's legitimacy.

Domestic opinion sets the floor

Berlin, December 15, 2025 — European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte arrive in Berlin this evening for expanded consultations on a possible Ukraine peace framework, joining President Volodymyr Zelensky, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, and other European heads of government. The gathering follows five hours of negotiations yesterday between Zelensky and U.S. envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, which Witkoff characterized as making "a lot of progress." Yet the diplomatic momentum confronts a hard political constraint: a new poll shows 75 percent of Ukrainians reject any peace deal requiring troop withdrawal from parts of Donbas without credible security guarantees.

That figure frames the central tension in Berlin. Washington's initial 28-point plan has been trimmed to 20 points after Ukrainian and European input, but contested elements remain—including conditions that could require Kyiv to relinquish territory in eastern Donbas and proposals for demilitarized zones whose enforcement modalities are unclear. Zelensky has said territorial questions must be decided by the Ukrainian people, potentially via referendum; Moscow has rejected any referendum and insists Donbas is "Russian territory." For Zelensky, any settlement that precedes enforceable guarantees with territorial concessions risks collapsing under domestic political weight, repeating the failures of the Budapest Memorandum and the Minsk accords.

What's on the table—and what's still contested

The narrowed 20-point draft addresses NATO membership language, security guarantees, territorial control in Donbas, and the status of the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant. The Kremlin continues to call a formal ban on Ukraine's NATO membership a "cornerstone" demand and expects an update from the U.S. after the Berlin talks. Reuters and other outlets have reported Zelensky signaled readiness to suspend NATO accession aspirations—currently enshrined in Ukraine's constitution—in favor of "Article 5-like" guarantees. But the gulf between suspension and an outright ban remains wide, and the legal force of any guarantee remains the subject of intense negotiation.

Kyiv seeks legally binding U.S. and European commitments that would deter renewed invasion: bilateral U.S.-Ukraine guarantees coupled with a European security package. Zelensky has framed these as a compromise acceptable only if they carry treaty weight, clarity of triggers, and deployable capability. Moscow's position remains maximalist, demanding not only a NATO ban but Ukrainian troop withdrawals from Donbas areas that Russia does not currently control. European capitals, meanwhile, fear that demilitarized-zone proposals lacking third-party monitoring and automatic enforcement mechanisms could allow persistent Russian police or National Guard presence, enabling covert re-entry and control.

Exclusive Analysis Continues:

Members are reading: Why "Article 5-like" guarantees risk repeating the failures of Budapest and Minsk without legal force and automatic triggers.

Become a Member for Full Access

War continues as diplomacy accelerates

The talks unfold against ongoing Russian strikes. Multiple reports document large-scale drone and missile attacks targeting energy infrastructure; the Odesa region suffered massive power outages after overnight barrages. Zelensky reported that over 450 drones and 30 missiles hit Ukrainian targets in recent overnight periods, with weekly tallies exceeding 1,500 attack drones, approximately 900 guided aerial bombs, and 46 missiles of various types. Battlefield control remains contested in Donbas, particularly around Pokrovsk. Ahead of the Berlin talks, Zelensky made a defiant frontline visit to the Kupyansk area, countering Russian claims of territorial gains.

Parallel to the security track, EU leaders are preparing discussions on December 18–19 for a reparations-backed financing mechanism to support Ukraine over the next two years. The IMF calculates the total financing gap for Ukraine at around US$136.5 billion for 2026-29, with a residual financing gap of approximately US$63 billion for 2026-27 after accounting for existing financing commitments. Brussels is also exploring legal mechanisms to leverage frozen Russian assets, signaling that Europe's institutional engagement extends beyond diplomatic mediation to financial architecture and long-term reconstruction commitments.

What to watch tonight

The communiqué from this evening's consultations will reveal whether European and U.S. positions have converged on enforceable language. Key indicators include explicit affirmation of sovereignty and territorial integrity that avoids legitimizing territorial changes by force; precise wording distinguishing suspension from a permanent ban on NATO membership; and any reference to third-party verification, rapid-response mechanisms, or precommitted enforcement for demilitarized zones. Equally significant is whether guarantees are described as treaty-backed, time-bound, and resourced, or remain declaratory and consultative.

Washington's next step—outlining Congressional or executive instruments for guarantees—will determine whether the U.S. commitment can withstand political transition. Europe's willingness to build automaticity and deploy assets will signal whether sovereignty guardrails are prerequisites or negotiable. And the Kremlin's response, following any U.S. update, will clarify whether Moscow moderates its maximalist demands or continues to insist on terms that Ukraine's domestic opinion—and European institutional realism—cannot accept. Tonight's talks will show whether speed and legitimacy can be reconciled, or whether the gap between Washington's timeline and Kyiv's red line remains unbridgeable.