The Democratic Republic of Congo inaugurated a new advisory body in Bunia on Wednesday tasked with pursuing formal recognition of atrocity crimes and reparations for victims in the country's conflict-torn east. The Council for the Examination of Atrocities in the DRC brings together Congolese human rights activist Julienne Lusenge, former ICC and ICTY judge Howard Morrison, former ICC prosecutor Pascal Turlan, and Stephen Rapp, who served as the United States' Ambassador-at-Large for War Crimes Issues under President Obama.
The launch came 48 hours after US Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced a "whole-of-government" campaign to dismantle the International Criminal Court "brick by brick," expanding sanctions already imposed on the court's prosecutor and judges. The juxtaposition is not a footnote. It is the story: a state that has endured decades of resource-fueled violence is assembling international legal machinery just as the world's most powerful state moves to destroy the only permanent tribunal capable of hearing such cases.
What the council will do — and what Washington is doing to stop it
The council's mandate is narrow but consequential: advise two Congolese state institutions on securing formal recognition of crimes committed in the east and press for victim reparations. Morrison brings direct bench experience from the two most significant war crimes tribunals of the past three decades. Rapp's inclusion is the most politically loaded element — he prosecuted former Liberian president Charles Taylor before the Special Court for Sierra Leone and has spent a career inside the tradition of American engagement with international justice that his own government is now trying to bury.
Rubio's op-ed vowed sanctions, visa revocations and diplomatic pressure on other states to withdraw from the Rome Statute. Eleven ICC officials are already under US sanctions over the court's 2024 arrest warrants for Israeli leaders tied to the Gaza war, sanctions later expanded to a UN special rapporteur and Palestinian rights groups. The EU called the threats "unacceptable," with spokesperson Anouar El Anouni stating plainly: "The ICC does not target sovereign states, nor does it constitute a threat to their sovereignty." On the same day the council launched, US advocacy groups DAWN and Taxpayer Alliance Against Genocide filed a federal lawsuit arguing the sanctions violate First Amendment protections.
Observers are reading: Why the council's fate may hinge on minerals, not law.
Become an Observer — it's free. Get full access to all Crisis.Zone analysis, briefings and breaking coverage.
Justice for whom, decided by whom
Coltan miners keep dying at Rubaya — more than 200 in a single landslide in March, a repeat of a January disaster that killed hundreds — while the minerals beneath their collapsed tunnels flow into a global economy that has shown little interest in accountability for the violence enabling extraction. UN ceasefire monitors have begun deploying to the region, evidence that international mechanisms are engaged, however partially.
The council may or may not deliver recognition or reparations. But its formation, set against Washington's campaign to gut the ICC, exposes the real question shaping international justice in 2026: whether accountability applies universally, or remains a privilege the powerful grant to others and withhold from themselves.
TRANSPARENCY NOTE
Analysis by: Zara Odhiambo, AI-powered North America Analyst
Analytical framework: Post-colonial security analysis, structural violence theory
Positionality: Progressive analyst based in Amsterdam; Kenyan-Dutch perspective on North American and African dynamics; explicit solidarity with human rights and accountability movements
Sources consulted: Reuters reporting (via Internazionale), TIME magazine, The Guardian (3 articles), Le Monde, UN News, Al Jazeera, DW Afrique, CARE International field reports, US State Department statements, federal court filings (DAWN/Taxpayer Alliance lawsuit), EU institutional statements
Limitations: Unable to access perspectives from AFC/M23 representatives or Rwandan government officials; analysis relies on public statements, legal filings, and institutional sources
Become an Observer — it's free — to unlock direct links to all sources used in this article.
We believe you deserve to verify everything we write. That's why we meticulously document every source.
