President Donald Trump issued a stark ultimatum to Cuba on Sunday, declaring an end to all Venezuelan oil and financial flows to the island and demanding Havana "make a deal" with Washington. The warning, delivered via Truth Social, represents the strategic exploitation of last month's capture of Nicolás Maduro to eliminate Cuba's primary economic lifeline and force a fundamental recalibration of the hemisphere's oldest anti-American holdout.
This is not diplomacy in the traditional sense. It is coercive statecraft executed from a position of overwhelming leverage, weaponizing control over Venezuelan energy exports to compel Cuban submission. The question is no longer whether Washington can isolate Havana, but whether the Cuban government will seek terms before economic collapse forces regime-threatening internal unrest.
The anatomy of economic coercion
The instrument of pressure is precise and devastating. Cuba has relied on approximately 35,000 barrels per day of heavily subsidized Venezuelan crude, the remnant of a once-robust petrostate patronage that sustained the island through decades of U.S. sanctions. With American forces now controlling Venezuelan territory and Washington effectively directing Caracas's post-Maduro reconstruction, that flow can be terminated with administrative efficiency.
Trump's statement left no ambiguity: "THERE WILL BE NO MORE OIL OR MONEY GOING TO CUBA - ZERO! I strongly suggest they make a deal, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE." The capitalized emphasis signals intent, not bluster. Cuba's power grid already operates on the edge of systemic failure, with rolling blackouts routine even before this intervention. Elimination of Venezuelan supplies does not merely worsen an existing crisis; it threatens the basic functions of state operation.
The economic arithmetic is brutal. Cuba lacks hard currency reserves to purchase replacement crude on global markets, and no alternative patron possesses both the capacity and willingness to subsidize the island at Venezuela's historical levels. China maintains commercial ties but has shown no inclination to absorb Cuba as a dependent client. Russia, preoccupied with its European commitments, offers symbolic gestures rather than material support. Havana's options have contracted to binary simplicity: negotiate with Washington or manage cascading systems failure.
Members are reading: The unspoken terms of Trump's "deal" reveal calculated strategy to dismantle Cuba's sovereignty architecture and consolidate hemispheric control.
The realist endgame
The international system remains fundamentally anarchic, governed by capabilities rather than norms. Cuba's predicament illustrates this reality with clinical precision. Decades of revolutionary legitimacy, rhetorical sovereignty, and anti-imperial narrative cannot substitute for the material resources required to operate a modern state. Washington has seized control of those resources through its Venezuelan proxy, and Havana possesses no countervailing leverage.
The outcome will likely follow one of two trajectories. Cuba's leadership may calculate that negotiated subordination preserves regime survival better than collapse-induced upheaval, leading to talks that formalize diminished sovereignty in exchange for economic stabilization. Alternatively, the government may refuse terms, gambling that endurance through crisis renews revolutionary legitimacy and that geopolitical shifts eventually provide alternative patrons. The former reflects rational assessment of power imbalances; the latter represents ideological commitment detached from strategic reality.
From Washington's perspective, either outcome advances core interests. A negotiated settlement achieves Cuban subordination without the costs of direct intervention. Sustained refusal weakens a longtime adversary and sends deterrent signals to other regional actors considering alignment with extra-hemispheric powers. The strategic logic is sound, even if the humanitarian consequences prove severe. This is realpolitik in its most classical form: the strong do what they can, and the weak suffer what they must.
Subscribe to our free newsletter to unlock direct links to all sources used in this article.
We believe you deserve to verify everything we write. That's why we meticulously document every source.
