Two bombs dropped by a Myanmar military jet fighter struck a crowded tea shop in Mayakan village, Sagaing Region, killing at least 18 civilians and wounding 20 others. Among the dead were a five-year-old child and two schoolteachers. Villagers had gathered to watch a football match between Myanmar and the Philippines on television when air raid sirens sounded moments before impact, leaving little time to seek shelter. Over 20 nearby houses were damaged in the blast, according to eyewitness accounts reported by independent media outlet Myanmar Now and confirmed by AP and ABC News.
The attack, approximately 120 kilometers northwest of Mandalay in Depayin township, exemplifies a broader pattern of aerial bombardment that has intensified as the military junta prepares for elections scheduled for December 28. The strike targeted a social gathering space in a resistance stronghold where no recent fighting had been reported, underscoring the political logic driving the air campaign: terrorize civilian support networks, demonstrate dominance in contested territory, and shape the pre-election environment through force rather than consent.
Anatomy of an aerial assault
The December 5 strike followed a now-familiar sequence. Military aircraft approached Mayakan village shortly after 8 p.m. local time. Warning sirens activated, but the interval between alert and impact was too brief for meaningful evacuation. The tea shop—a community hub—bore the direct hit. Survivors described scenes of confusion and carnage, with debris scattered across residential compounds.
Funerals took place on December 6. In the aftermath, villagers began digging bomb shelters while others fled entirely, fearing follow-up strikes or ground reprisals. The military did not acknowledge the attack, a pattern consistent with its broader information strategy of neither confirming nor denying operations that generate civilian casualties. Independent media outlets published video and images of the destruction, providing the primary documentary record.
The hesitancy among residents to speak openly reflects a chilling effect that extends beyond the immediate blast radius. Fear of retribution shapes information flows from conflict zones, complicating real-time verification but also revealing the coercive intent embedded in these operations: not merely to eliminate armed opposition, but to suppress the civilian ecosystems that sustain resistance.
Documented pattern of indiscriminate bombardment
Members are reading: How territorial fragmentation and electoral imperatives converge to make aerial terror the junta's preferred pre-election strategy.
Accountability deficit and escalating humanitarian costs
The human toll extends far beyond individual strikes. Since the February 2021 coup, more than 3 million people have been displaced, and the UN estimates nearly 22 million require humanitarian assistance. Myanmar now tops global landmine casualty lists. UN humanitarian coordination offices report severe underfunding for emergency response even as airstrikes intensify, with civilians repeatedly caught in attacks that violate the principles of distinction and proportionality enshrined in international humanitarian law.
International condemnation has proven insufficient absent enforcement mechanisms. UN statements deploring attacks on civilians carry limited deterrent weight when accountability pathways remain blocked. Rights organizations have identified specific levers: cutting jet fuel flows that enable the air campaign, strengthening evidence collection for future war crimes prosecutions, and pushing for ICC jurisdiction through Security Council referral. Yet geopolitical fragmentation—particularly among ASEAN member states and major powers with economic interests in Myanmar—has prevented coordinated action that might impose costs sufficient to alter junta calculations.
Meanwhile, resistance forces lack air defense capabilities, leaving civilian populations reliant on ad hoc measures—makeshift shelters, early warning networks, and the hope that gatherings small enough or mundane enough might escape targeting. The December 5 attack demonstrates the inadequacy of such measures when military aircraft can strike social spaces with impunity.
Elections under fire
The tea shop in Mayakan village—a place where neighbors gathered to watch football—now stands as rubble and a casualty list. Its destruction three weeks before scheduled elections captures the reality of Myanmar's current political moment: not a contest for votes, but a campaign of aerial coercion designed to punish resistance zones and demonstrate dominance where territorial control remains contested. As the December 28 date approaches, the gap between the junta's electoral theater and the lived experience of communities under bombardment could not be starker.
For civilians in Sagaing and across Myanmar's conflict zones, "election season" means air raid sirens, funerals, and the construction of bomb shelters—a grim measure of governance by violence rather than consent. Whether international actors move beyond condemnation to impose meaningful costs on the air campaign will determine how many more tea shops, schools, and places of worship join the casualty count.
Subscribe to our free newsletter to unlock direct links to all sources used in this article.
We believe you deserve to verify everything we write. That's why we meticulously document every source.
