Saudi strikes on UAE weapons expose deepening Gulf rift in Yemen

The Saudi-UAE alliance that intervened in Yemen a decade ago effectively collapsed on Tuesday when Saudi warplanes bombed a weapons shipment at Mukalla port—cargo allegedly sent by the United Arab Emirates to arm the Southern Transitional Council, a separatist force now advancing across Yemen's south. Riyadh's statement was unequivocal: the UAE's actions are "extremely dangerous," and the unauthorized arms transfer violated all coordination protocols. Within hours, Yemen's Presidential Leadership Council—the Saudi-backed government—canceled its defense pact with Abu Dhabi, declared a state of emergency, and demanded withdrawal of Emirati forces.

This is not merely a crack in the coalition, but the structural failure of a partnership with irreconcilable aims. While Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates initially presented a united front against the Houthis, divisions emerged over time. Yet beneath that surface, the two Gulf powers have been pursuing fundamentally divergent strategic objectives: Riyadh seeks a unified Yemen under a friendly government to secure its southern border, while Abu Dhabi has supported the Southern Transitional Council, a separatist group, and constructed a network of ports and surveillance infrastructure across the Horn of Africa to project influence and control maritime chokepoints. That contradiction has now erupted into open conflict, transforming Yemen into a proxy war within a civil war that threatens to fragment the country beyond repair.

The anatomy of alliance breakdown

The immediate trigger was specific: Saudi Arabia detected a cargo vessel at Mukalla carrying weapons and military equipment with disabled tracking systems, destined for STC forces. The Saudi military statement emphasized that the shipment bypassed all coordination mechanisms with the Yemeni government and violated protocols governing arms transfers. The airstrike that followed was not a warning shot but a definitive statement—Saudi Arabia will no longer tolerate the UAE's parallel military infrastructure in Yemen, even if that means striking the assets of a formal ally.

The Yemeni government's response demonstrated how completely the rupture has widened. The Presidential Leadership Council's emergency decree didn't just suspend cooperation; it reframed the UAE from partner to threat. The demand for withdrawal of Emirati forces from Yemeni territory treats Abu Dhabi as an occupying power, not an allied liberator. This language matters. It signals that from Riyadh's perspective, the UAE has crossed from partner to rival, its actions now indistinguishable from hostile intervention.

The STC's recent territorial gains provide essential context. Over recent weeks, the separatist force has consolidated control across Hadramout and al-Mahra governorates—resource-rich eastern provinces that were previously under nominal government authority. These are not marginal territories. Hadramout contains critical energy infrastructure, while al-Mahra borders Oman and Saudi Arabia, offering strategic depth and access to the Arabian Sea beyond the Bab al-Mandeb chokepoint. The STC's expansion, clearly enabled by Emirati support, effectively creates a UAE sphere of influence bisecting Yemen and threatening Saudi border security.

Unlock the Full Analysis:

Members are reading: How divergent strategic visions in Sudan, Libya, and maritime security reveal this rupture as inevitable, not accidental.

Become a Member

Implications for Yemen and regional order

The immediate beneficiary of this Saudi-UAE breakdown is the force both supposedly sought to contain: the Houthis. With the anti-Houthi coalition now fractured into competing camps—Saudi-backed government forces versus UAE-backed separatists—the movement faces a fragmented opposition incapable of coordinated strategy. The Houthis have already demonstrated sophisticated capabilities through their deployment of missiles, drones, and uncrewed kamikaze boats in Red Sea operations, including anti-ship ballistic missiles and anti-ship cruise missiles; a divided adversary only strengthens their position.

For Yemen itself, this adds yet another layer to an already catastrophic conflict. The country now faces not two but three distinct power centers—Houthi-controlled north, Saudi-backed government, and UAE-backed STC south—each with external patrons pursuing incompatible objectives. The prospect of meaningful political settlement recedes further when the external actors cannot even agree on the basic contours of Yemen's political future: unified state or partitioned territories.

The broader message extends beyond Yemen's borders. The most significant Arab military alliance of the post-Arab Spring era has publicly unraveled over fundamental strategic contradictions that were present from the beginning but papered over by shared threat perception. When alliances are built on negative consensus—opposition to a common enemy—rather than positive alignment of long-term interests, they remain vulnerable to exactly this kind of structural failure. The question now is not whether the Saudi-UAE partnership can be repaired, but whether the regional order they jointly shaped over the past decade can survive their competition.