Developing story
We are following this story for new developments and will update this article when significant news emerges.
Monitored since 4 November 2026 | no updates yet
Key takeaways
- The New York Times reports US officials say the State Department is negotiating a status of forces agreement with Venezuela.
- Troop numbers and sites are left to later agreements, and a senior US official says base talks are far off.
- The interim government has given no election date, so any pact signed now could outlast the government that signs it.
The Trump administration is negotiating a Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) with Venezuela that would lay the foundation for a potential long-term US military presence in the country, the New York Times reported, citing unnamed US officials. The newspaper cited unnamed US officials who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive diplomacy. A SOFA is a military pact that sets the legal terms for foreign forces operating in a host country.
The State Department, led by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, is running the talks. The Venezuelan side is the government of Delcy Rodríguez, whose administration negotiates diplomatic agreements with the department, the Times noted. A senior State Department official, speaking in Caracas and not named, said Washington expects to expand security cooperation. He said any serious discussion of bases was "way, way down the road" and that there were no current talks about bases with the Venezuelan government. The reporting reviewed did not confirm how Caracas has responded.
What the agreement would cover
Anadolu Agency, relaying the Times, reported that the agreement would create a "legal framework" for US forces to carry out mutually agreed activities: ship visits, training, military exercises and humanitarian assistance.
Troop numbers and locations would be worked out in future agreements, the Times reported. It is unclear whether the United States would build its own bases or place troops on existing Venezuelan ones. No deployment under the pact has been reported, and no agreement has been reported as concluded.
The talks follow months of deepening ties. US forces seized President Nicolás Maduro on 3 January and took him to New York. Rodríguez, his vice president, was sworn in as interim president on 5 January. In June, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said a strike that killed Tren de Aragua gang leader Héctor "Niño Guerrero" Guerrero Flores happened "in full collaboration with Venezuelan security forces." Four US officials told the Times that US intelligence and drones supported a Venezuelan strike on the National Liberation Army (ELN) in Apure state on 30 October. Neither government has commented officially. An oil arrangement announced in late summer has disputed terms.
Observers are reading: how the sequencing of the pact, the unset election date and the Venezuelan consent question fit together, and what the Times' framing leaves unanswered.
Become an Observer, it's free. Get full access to all Crisis.Zone analysis, briefings and breaking coverage.
What to watch
Four markers will show where the talks lead. The first is whether Caracas publicly confirms or rejects them. The second is whether the text is published, or whether it goes before Venezuela's National Assembly, a question the reporting does not answer. The third is whether follow-on agreements name sites and troop numbers. The fourth is how any election timetable interacts with the pact.
For now, the confirmed facts are narrow. The Times, citing anonymous US officials, says talks are under way. A senior State Department official says bases are far off. No deal or deployment has been reported, and Venezuela's government has not commented on the talks. The account so far rests on US officials, not on Caracas.
Become an Observer (it's free) to unlock direct links to all sources used in this article.
We believe you deserve to verify everything we write. That's why we meticulously document every source.
