Somalia's Ministry of Defence announced Thursday that its armed forces, in coordination with unnamed international partners, eliminated 29 al-Shabaab militants in the southeastern town of Jabad Godane. The statement emphasized the operation's success and the government's commitment to degrading the militant group's operational capacity. Yet this tactical victory arrives amid a broader reality that official communiqués systematically obscure: al-Shabaab has spent much of 2025 not in retreat, but in strategic expansion, recapturing territory, encircling major population centers, and exploiting deepening fissures within Somalia's already fragile federal architecture.
The timing of this announcement demands scrutiny. While Mogadishu celebrates isolated successes, intelligence assessments paint a starkly different picture—one in which the militant group has regained initiative across multiple fronts, capitalizing on political dysfunction between the Federal Government and regional states. The Jabad Godane operation, however genuine its tactical outcomes, risks becoming another data point in a manufactured narrative of progress that masks a deteriorating security landscape.
The myth of momentum
Government forces have conducted similar operations throughout 2025, each accompanied by triumphant press releases and body counts that rarely withstand independent verification. The Jabad Godane raid follows this familiar pattern: a discrete military action against a militant position, framed as evidence of sustained pressure on al-Shabaab's network. What these announcements consistently omit is the strategic context in which such operations occur.
Al-Shabaab's tactical adaptability has long exceeded the Somali National Army's capacity for sustained territorial control. The group's decentralized command structure allows it to absorb localized losses while maintaining operational coherence across its broader network. Individual firefights, even those resulting in significant militant casualties, have historically done little to alter al-Shabaab's strategic calculus or its ability to project power across south-central Somalia.
The emphasis on "coordination with international partners" further complicates the narrative. Somalia's counterinsurgency apparatus remains heavily dependent on external military support—from African Union transition missions to U.S. drone capabilities and Turkish training programs. This dependency raises fundamental questions about the sustainability of any tactical gains. Operations like Jabad Godane may demonstrate the effectiveness of combined arms approaches, but they also highlight the Somali state's continued inability to project force independently.
Members are reading: How al-Shabaab's 2025 territorial expansion and Somalia's political fractures reveal the strategic bankruptcy behind tactical victories.
The illusion of progress
The Jabad Godane operation will likely produce more press releases, perhaps intelligence windfalls if communications equipment was captured, and temporary disruption to local al-Shabaab networks. What it will not produce is strategic momentum. Without addressing the structural conditions that enable al-Shabaab's persistence—chronic political fragmentation, economic marginalization of rural communities, absence of credible governance alternatives, and dependency on external security guarantees—tactical victories remain isolated incidents rather than components of a coherent strategy.
The sobering reality is that after nearly two decades of counterinsurgency operations, al-Shabaab controls more territory and exercises greater governance authority in 2025 than at several previous points in this protracted conflict. Somali and international forces have killed thousands of militants, disrupted financing networks, and eliminated senior commanders. Yet the group adapts, reconstitutes, and exploits the fundamental weakness of a federal structure that cannot project legitimate authority beyond heavily fortified urban centers. Until Mogadishu and its international partners confront these deeper dynamics, announcements like Thursday's will continue to mask a strategic drift that favors not the Somali state, but its most resilient adversary.
Subscribe to our free newsletter to unlock direct links to all sources used in this article.
We believe you deserve to verify everything we write. That's why we meticulously document every source.
